References-Clickers

=References- Clickers in STEM education= Personal response devices, personal response systems.

Carl Weiman Science Education Initiative (CWSEI)- [|clicker resources.]
 * WEBSITE**

Gender differences http://derekbruff.com/teachingwithcrs/?p=33 Classroom Response System "clickers" Bibliography-- http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/docs/classroom-response-system-clickers-bibliography/
 * ARTICLES**
 * 1) Barber, M., and Njus, D.. Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design. CBE—Life Sci. Educ. 6, 1–8. 2007- This article is a review of all clicker systems
 * 2) Beatty, I. D., Gerace, W. J., Leonar, W. J., and Dufresne, R. J. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. Am. J. Phys. 74(1), 31–39.2006
 * 3) BeattyI.Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems.//Educause//:1–13,2004.
 * 4) Beekes, W. The “Millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learn. Higher Educ. 7(1), 25–36.2006
 * 5) Bessler, W. C., and Nisbet, J. J. (1971). The use of an electronic response system in teaching biology. Sci. Educ. 55, 275–284.
 * 6) Brown, J. D. (1972). An evaluation of the Spitz student response system in teaching a course in logical and mathematical concepts. J. Exp. Educ. 40, 12–20.
 * 7) Burnstein, RA, Lederman, LM.Using wireless keypads in lecture classes.//Phys Teach//39:8–11,2001.[|[CrossRef]]
 * 8) Brewer, C. (2004). Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses. BioScience 54(11), 1034–1039.
 * 9) Bunce, D. M., Van den Plas, J. R., and Havanki, K. L. (2006).Comparing the effectiveness on student achievement of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. J. Chem. Educ., 83(3), 488–493.
 * 10) Burnstein, R. A., and Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Phys. Teach. 39, 8–11.
 * 11) *****Caldwell,J.E. Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE- Life Science Education 6:9-20, 2007**
 * 12) Crossgrove and Curran. Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-Level Biology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material. CBE- Life Sci Educ 7, 146–154. 2008
 * 13) Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., Rodenbaugh, D. W., and DiCarlo, S. E. Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 27, 102–108.2003
 * 14) Dantas, AM, Kemm, RE.A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component.//Adv Physiol Educ//32:65–75,2008.[|[Abstract/Free Full Text]]
 * 15) d’Inverno, R., Davis, H., and White, S. (2003). Using a personal response system for promoting student interaction. Teach. Math. Appl. 22(4), 163–169.
 * 16) Draper, SW, Brown, MI.Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system.//J Comp Assist Learn//20:81–94,2004.[|[CrossRef]]
 * 17) Draper, S. W. (2002). Evaluating effective use of PRS: results of the evaluation of the use of PRS in Glasgow University, October 2001-
 * 18) June 2002. www.psy.gla.ac.uk/steve/ilig/papers/eval.pdf
 * 19) Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., and Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. J. Comp. High. Educ. 7, 3–47.
 * 20) Duncan, D. (2005). Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems, New York: Addison Wesley and Benjamin Cummings.
 * 21) Duncan,D., Clickers in the Astronomy Classroom (Pearson Education, San Francisco, 2006).
 * 22) El-Rady, J.To click or not to click: that's the question.//Innov J Online Educ//2:2006.
 * 23) Elliott, C.Using a personal response system in economics teaching.//Int Rev Econ Educ//1:80–86,2003.
 * 24) Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., and Wenderoth, M. P. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 132–139. 2007
 * 25) Gauci, S, Dantas, A.M., Williams, D.A. and Kemm, R.E. Advan. Physiol. Educ. 33:60-71, 2009
 * 26) Gerace, WJ, Dufresne, RJ, Leonard, WJ.//Using Technology to Implement Active Learning in Large Classes//.Amherst, MA:Univ. of Massachusetts Physics Education Research Group,PERG-1999#11-Nov#2,1999.
 * 27) Hatch, J., and Jensen, M. (2005). Manna from Heaven or “clickers” from Hell. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 34(7), 36–39.
 * 28) Jensen, M., Moore, R., and Hatch, J. (2002). Electronic cooperative quizzes. Am. Biol. Teach. 64, 169–174.
 * 29) Johnson, D., and McLeod, S. (2004). Get answers: using student response systems to see students’ thinking. Learn. Lead. Technol. 32(4), 18–23.
 * 30) Judson, E., and Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from the past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 21, 167–181.
 * 31) Klionsky, D. J. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the lecture hall. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 31, 246–251.
 * 32) Knight, J. K., and Wood, W. G. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol. Educ. 4, 298–310.
 * 33) Lane, JL, Aleksic, M.Transforming elementary statistics to enhance student learning.//EDRS//:1–19,2002.
 * 34) Meltzer, D. E., and Manivannan, K. (2002). Transforming the lecture-hall environment: the fully interactive physics lecture. Am. J. Phys. 70, 639–654.
 * 35) Nichol, D. J., and Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Stud. Higher Educ. 28, 457–473.
 * 36) Paschal, CB.Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system.//Adv Physiol Educ//26:299–308,2002.[|[Abstract/Free Full Text]]
 * 37) Poulis, J., Massen, C., Robens, E., and Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. Am. J. Phys. 66, 439–441.
 * 38) Preszler, R., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., and Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 29–41.
 * 39) Rao, S. P., and DiCarlo, S. E. (2000). Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 24, 51–55.
 * 40) Reay, N. W., Li, Pengfei, & Bao, Lei. (2008). Testing a new voting machine methodology. //American Journal of Physics//, 72(2), 171-178
 * 41) Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., and Abrahamson, L. (2004a). Classroom Response and Communication Systems: Research Review and Theory. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 2004. ubiqcomputing.org/CATAALYST_AERA_Proposal.pdf (accessed 16 July 2006).
 * 42) Schackow, TE, Chavez, M, Loya, L, Friedman, M.Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.//Family Med//36:496–504,2004.[|[Web of Science]][|[Medline]]
 * 43) Sharma, MD, Khachan, J, Chan, B, O'Byrne, J.An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes.//Austr J Educ Technol//21:137–154,2005.
 * 44) Slain, D., Abate, M., Hodges, B. M., Stamatakis, M. K., and Wolak, S. (2004). An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 68, 1–9.
 * 45) Smith, A. C., Stewart, R., Shields, P., Hayes-Klosteridis, J., Robinson, P., and Yuan, R. (2005). Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses. Cell Biol. Educ. 4(2), 143–156.
 * 46) Suchman, E., Uchiyama, K., Smith, R., and Bender, K. (2006). Evaluating the impact of a classroom response system in a microbiology course. Microbiol. Educ. 7, 3–11.
 * 47) Tessier, J. (2004). Using peer teaching to promote learning in biology. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 33, 16–19.
 * 48) Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be. . . . The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections 3(2), 14–20.
 * 49) Wood, W. B. (2004). Clickers: a teaching gimmick that works. Dev.Cell 7(6), 796–798.
 * 50) Yoder, JD, Hochevar, CM.Encouraging active learning can improve students' performance on examinations.//Teach Psychol//32:91–95,2005.[|[CrossRef]][|[Web of Science]]
 * 51) Zeilik, M., and Morris, V. J. (2004). The impact of cooperative quizzes in a large introductory astronomy course for non-science majors. Astron. Educ. Rev. 3, 51–61.